The southern border
is not “being invaded”.
There’s not a military enemy
swimming across the Rio Grande.

Citizens, why do you frame humans
as illegal migrants?
When all they’re seeking
is “humanitarian parole.”

Installing razor wire
is not a state’s “right of self-defense”.
It’s a “crime against humanity”
don’t you also bleed, when you’re cut?

The asylum law
doesn’t condone cruelty to refugees.
Nobody has the legal right
to denigrate immigrants.

Republicans complain about the border crisis,
but when Senator Lankford
negotiated a bill with the Democrats,
MAGA Republicans threw him under the bus.

They are afraid, that if it becomes law,
it will get Biden reelected?
That’s why they want to kill the bill
even if it secures the border?

Republicans, do you want to fix the border,
or do you still hope Trump will be reelected?
But he can only campaign on the border crisis
or Biden will call him a loser again.

Republicans don’t you remember that
when Trump was president, he failed you?
He promised to build a border wall,
and that Mexico would pay for it too.

Even if Trump wins the election,
he still can’t close the border,
unless you allow him
to undermine our democracy.

Republicans why can’t you understand?
That you should defend the constitution
because it’s the only border
that protects citizens from tyranny.

By: ElRoyPoet © 2024

The southern border of the United States has been a hot-button issue for the past 7 years, with debates raging on about immigration policies and border security. The false equivalency that the border is being “invaded” by an enemy is fear-mongering propaganda. Those who are crossing the Rio Grande are not hostile military forces but individuals seeking asylum. It is crucial to shift our perspective and recognize the humanity of those coming to our borders in search of safety and opportunity.

Immigration deal hangs in the balance as U.S. border crisis divides the country

One of the key issues at play is the way Republicans frame immigrants as “illegal migrants”. However, the reality is that many of these individuals are simply seeking “humanitarian parole’, a basic right that should be afforded to all refugees. Installing razor wire deterrents and harsh security measures along the border is not about a state’s “right of self-defense”—it is a “crime against humanity” and a violation of basic human rights. We must remember that cruelty and the denigration of immigrants are not only unethical, but also go against the principles of a civil society.

Lankford addresses Trump’s opposition to possible Senate immigration deal

The asylum law is in place to protect refugees and provide them with a safe haven, not to subject them to further oppression. It is imperative that we uphold the values enshrined in this law and treat all individuals with dignity and respect. Nationalists and politicians who complain about the border crisis must remember that finding solutions requires cooperation and compromise. Republican Senator Lankford’s efforts to negotiate a bill with Democrats should be commended, not censured.

Romney accuses Trump of trying to stop bill to blame Biden

It is unpatriotic that some Republicans are more concerned about former President Trump being able to campaign on the border crisis than actually fixing it. Their fear of a potential law increasing President Biden chances of being reelected are a poor excuse for impeding a bipartisan solution. We must prioritize the well-being of all individuals and work towards creating a fair and humane immigration system.

Republicans Should OPPOSE Border Deal To Hurt Biden

Ironically, the previous administration failed to address the border crisis. President Trump’s 2016 promise to build a border wall that Mexico would pay for was just another of his fabrications. Now, it appears that the MAGA Republicans are falling for the same campaign rhetoric in 2024 because they really don’t want the border fixed—they just want it closed!

Excerpt from Five myths about the refugee crisis

Consequently, Republican politicians are willing to endure another year of a porous border in the hopes that when Trump gets reelected, he will break the asylum law, as most far-right illiberal democracies do. We must not compromise our democratic values in pursuit of misguided policies that harm vulnerable populations.

GOP senators seethe as Trump blows up delicate immigration compromise

It is paramount that Republicans realize that defending the Constitution and upholding democratic principles is crucial for the survival of our republic. The Constitution serves as the ultimate border that protects citizens from tyranny and ensures the rule of law. By embracing humane and inclusive policies, we can create a better future for all individuals, irrespective of their backgrounds or circumstances. It is time to move forward with empathy, understanding, and a commitment to justice.

“Griffin has previously claimed to be ‘terrified’ by anti-immigrant political rhetoric. ‘Our entire country is built on the work ethic of immigrants,’ he said at a conference in 2017. 
But his views appear to have changed. Griffin did not respond to questions about whether he endorses the RGA’s rhetoric, whether he agrees that the country needs to be ‘protected’ from migrants seeking a better life in America, whether he endorsed the use of razor wire at the border, and if he will continue to donate to the Republican Governors Association (RGA) going forward. Instead, Griffin told Rolling Stone in a statement: ‘Americans are fed up with the chaos at our Southern border and the federal government’s inept policies. Even President Biden realizes he has a real crisis on his hands. Rolling Stone is hypocritical in criticizing Governor Abbott for taking action when the federal government has clearly failed. Like most Americans, I believe our border should be safe and secure while preserving a path for people to legally immigrate to America to seek a better life.’” Excerpt from: Amazon, Chevron, and Wells Fargo Are Fueling a Constitutional Crisis

“The inhumanity of bigots and tyrants is that they will never experience guilt or regret, about their desires superseding the needs of those whom they control or hold power over. They are not capable of feeling empathy or compassion for inferior beings.” By B. Bondsman

“Most of us are economic immigrants—even if within our own countries—but the term has taken on a new and pejorative meaning since the refugee crisis. It is often deployed in much the same way that “bogus asylum seeker” was in the past by the British tabloid press—to suggest that people are trying to play the system, that their presence is the cause of problems at the border, and that if we could only filter them out, order would be restored. In fact, the history of migration is a history of controls on the movement of all but a wealthy elite.
In the past, states sought to restrict the movement of their own populations, through slavery or serfdom, or poor laws and vagrancy acts; today the right to move freely within one’s own territory is enshrined in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Most of us take this right for granted, even though it is relatively recent. Now, instead, the movement of people across international borders is tightly controlled and regulated. As a proportion of the world population, the total number of international migrants—of any kind—has stayed relatively steady: roughly 3% since 1960, according to the sociologist Hein de Haas.” Excerpt from Five myths about the refugee crisis

“Migrants have to bank on the fact: ‘That its easier to ask for forgiveness, than it is to ask for permission’ to come to America. Because MAGA Republicans will never allow it; they hate poor immigrants and only love rich tourists.” By: B. Bondman

Balancing Border Security and Civil Rights: The Flaw in the MAGA Republicans’ Vision for America

In American political discourse, the MAGA Republicans have gained national attention for their unwavering support of Trump and his illiberal democratic propaganda. While they advocate for strong border protection, it is crucial to examine the implications of their vision. The desire for border security and how to achieve it may inadvertently lead to sacrificing civil rights, potentially pushing towards an autocratic government.

Amazon, Chevron, and Wells Fargo Are Fueling a Constitutional Crisis

MAGA Republicans prioritize border security, raising questions about the methods they would employ to achieve this goal. Trump’s incendiary rhetoric concerning building a wall on the southern border captured their imagination, promising a robust defense against illegal migration. However, securing the border effectively may require measures that impede individual freedoms and civil rights.

“To tighten border control to the extent some MAGA Republicans desire, we must consider the lessons learned from autocracies.”

To achieve comprehensive border security on the scale proposed by some MAGA Republicans, sacrificing civil rights may be necessary – leading towards an autocratic state. Autocratic governments, known for their closed borders, prioritize security over civil liberties. Citizens often face limitations on their freedoms as a trade-off for extreme border enforcement.

“So the citizen has a choice to make: Do you want to trade your border crisis for a constitutional crisis? Because that’s the only trade-off an autocrat can offer you.”

The implications of MAGA Republicans’ proposals become even more apparent when examining their potential impact on democracy. A fundamental pillar of democracies is the protection of individual rights, including freedom of movement and personal liberties. MAGA Republicans’ narrow focus on securing the border without sufficient consideration for civil rights can potentially erode the democratic principles they claim to uphold.

“In trying to solve 1 problem, it becomes important not to create others of equal or greater magnitude.”

Implementing strict border control policies can lead to discrimination and exclusion, unintentionally fueling xenophobia towards certain nationalities or religious groups. Sacrificing inclusivity and diversity may not be worth the price of zero tolerance border security measures.

House Republicans bash Mayorkas over Southern border

The difference lies in the fact that the very system MAGA Republicans cherish—liberal democracy, is incompatible with the autocratic practices often associated with closed borders. Democracy thrives on the exchange of ideas, diversity, and the protection of individual rights. Pushing for rigid border security without considering civil liberties undermines the essence of democracy, potentially leading to an erosion of freedoms in pursuit of a singular objective.

“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” By: Benjamin Franklin

The MAGA Republicans vision for stringent border security entails complex considerations. While their desire to protect the border is understandable, it is essential to recognize the potential consequences of such measures. Achieving comprehensive border security may inadvertently lead to the sacrifice of civil rights and the erosion of democratic principles.

Five Biggest Border Lies Debunked

Ideally, a balanced approach must be sought, one that ensures border security without compromising individual liberties. Recognizing the importance of inclusivity, diversity, and the protection of civil rights is necessary in safeguarding democratic ideals. By engaging in thoughtful policy-making, we can aspire to navigate this complex landscape, securing our borders while upholding the democratic principles that define us as a society.

“You must not exploit a resident alien or oppress him, since you were resident aliens in the land of Egypt.” Bible, Exodus 22:21