In injured hearts where hope takes root,
A sister’s spiritual journey ends up moot.
Women yearn for a path made clear,
Yet often feel the weight of men’s fear.
In church, at home, where voices rise,
Men stand as leaders, firm and wise.
Their call to follow, a choice they claim,
While women tread on paths of shame.
For family’s sake, she bends her will,
Obeys the dogma, and climbs that hill.
Masked in religion, her truth concealed,
In silence, her internal battle is revealed.
Her survival instincts holds her tight;
To nurture her young, she dims the light.
Surrendering softly, she carries the load,
While her patriarch walks the holy road.
Men sacrifice bodies in the communal fight,
Preserving humanity in the name of right.
Yet women’s love, emotional and profound,
Seek opportunities, where grace is found.
Conservative men grip tradition’s hand,
Raise the banner high, to protect the land.
While liberal women seek broader skies,
Pleading for mercy, where freedom lies.
And still, she can not bear the blame,
For in the design lies Her Maker’s Name.
And in His divine purpose, each role aligns,
Unseen, the faith in the soft heart binds.
Edited by: ElRoyPoet, 2025
Commentary: How do you tell which sex is more spiritual. Even if women would want to be more religious, they often feel a sense of powerlessness. In both church and home, men are expected to take on the role of spiritual leaders. When men choose to follow Jesus, it is often a personal decision; women, on the other hand, do so out of necessity, seeking protection from men. Whether this favor comes directly from one man or indirectly from God through men, it ultimately serves the same purpose for her. Her survival instincts have taught her to adhere to the community’s code of conduct for her own safety and the well-being of her children. As a result, she may mask her true beliefs or profess faith to avoid raising suspicion about her devotion.
Men are often willing to sacrifice their bodies for the greater good of society, whereas women typically only make sacrifices for themselves and their offspring. This distinction leads to men being viewed as more spiritual and inclined to uphold conservative values, as they focus on preserving their community. In contrast, women are more emotional and may advocate for a liberal approach to secure greater opportunities for themselves and their children to maintain their freedoms. Nevertheless, women should not be blamed or considered less worthy, for in God’s divine plan, that is the role He has assigned to them.
What does the Bible say about women pastors?
The Examination of Gender and Religious Engagement: A Sociological Perspective
In recent decades, the question of whether men or women are more religious in modern society has prompted extensive debate among sociologists, theologians, and cultural analysts. This inquiry extends beyond mere attendance at religious services, encompassing a broader spectrum of spiritual engagement that includes personal faith, community involvement, and the underpinning motivations for these acts of devotion. Surprisingly, sociological evidence suggests that, generally, women tend to exhibit greater religious engagement than men. This editorial explores the manifestations of religious participation across genders, incorporating biblical insights, sociological findings, and psychological perspectives while examining the complex motivations behind acts of spirituality.
Gender Differences in Religious Participation
Various sociological studies underscore a consistent trend: women are more likely than men to identify with a religious group, attend worship services, and engage in prayer. For instance, a study published by the Pew Research Center in 2016 found that 63% of women identified with a particular faith tradition, compared to 48% of men. This trend can be observed across major world religions including Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Judaism. In Christianity, for example, women often fill roles as primary caregivers for children’s spiritual education, which can foster deeper ties to the faith community. In Islam, while men are encouraged to attend mosque for communal prayers, women often partake in spiritual practices that emphasize a more familial and close-knit view of worship, such as gatherings in the home for Quran study.
Scholars have noted that women’s religious experiences are often characterized by a deeper emotional connection and a communal approach to faith, wherein relationships among congregants are prioritized. In contrast, men’s relationship with religion may reflect values of authority and leadership, often resulting in a less expressive emotional engagement with faith-based activities. Within Hinduism, traditional roles often place men in positions of ritual leadership, while women may engage in domestic rituals that foster community support and familial bonds.
The Context of Power Dynamics
However, this increased religious engagement among women can occur alongside feelings of powerlessness. Sociological theories, such as those discussed by sociologist Arlie Hochschild in her work on the “second shift,” highlight how women often undertake the emotional labor of maintaining family and community ties, which can lead to significant expectations and burdens. The notion that men are traditionally viewed as spiritual leaders, both in the church and the home, can adversely affect women’s spiritual agency. Even if women desire a more profound spiritual engagement, societal structures may inhibit them from fully realizing this aspiration.
In religious traditions such as Christianity, where biblical patriarchs often dominate narratives, women’s roles within the church can be marginalized. Yet, figures like Mary Magdalene and the women of faith embedded in both the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament provide counter-narratives that elevate female spiritual agency. Similarly, in Buddhism, the concept of “bodhisattva” transcends gender, illustrating that both men and women can embody the qualities needed for enlightenment, yet cultural practices often still reflect gender biases that limit women’s full participation.
Additionally, the survival instincts of women—where obedience to community codes becomes a matter of self-preservation—underscore another critical dimension. This perspective aligns with evolutionary psychology, which suggests that women have historically navigated hierarchical structures by aligning themselves with social norms to ensure the safety of themselves and their offspring. Sociologists Candace West and Don Zimmerman highlight how gendered performances often lead individuals to ‘do gender’ in ways that conform to societal expectations. Thus, women may feel compelled to mask or feign their levels of faithfulness, adhering to communal codes to avoid negative repercussions or suspicion.
Motivations Behind Spiritual Acts: Women
The motivations guiding women’s religious engagement are multifaceted but often involve the need for safety, community, and emotional expression. These motivations highlight an emotional and social dimension of faith that draws women into spiritual practices. Psychologically, women may appreciate faith not only as a refuge but also as a support system, especially when traditional familial structures place burdens on their autonomy. As noted by feminist scholars, the expectations placed on women to assume a caretaker role may reinforce their participation in faith communities, as these environments often provide a nurturing framework for building relationships.
In Judaism, women traditionally play pivotal roles within the family unit, often responsible for many rituals that ensure the faith is passed down through generations. Their engagement can be interpreted as reflective of their ability to weave community resilience into familial ties. However, the tendency for women to mask their true beliefs poses a dilemma. Their outward expressions of faith might not always reflect genuine belief but rather a strategic alignment with communal norms that enhance their social standing and ensure their safety.
Male Religious Engagement: A Different Landscape
Conversely, men’s engagement with religion can often be characterized by individualistic tendencies and adherence to traditional structures that promote masculine values. The assertion that men are willing to sacrifice their bodies for the community, while women primarily sacrifice for the family, aligns with sociological theories concerning gender roles and social expectations. Scholars like Michael Kimmel have referenced these tendencies in discussing how men may be socialized into roles that elevate community responsibility over emotional expressiveness.
In Islam, the emphasis on male guardianship can lead to interpretations of spirituality that are tightly bound to societal roles, where men are responsible for maintaining the faith of the family, thereby reinforcing male participation in communal worship settings. Such positions may ultimately isolate men from the emotional connections cultivated in women’s spiritual practices but can also drive them to seek fulfillment and identity through leadership roles.
Motivations Behind Spiritual Acts: Men
While men may engage less frequently in overt expressions of faith, their motivations for spiritual engagement often stem from a search for identity, purpose, and a moral framework. However, the cultural constructs of masculinity can deter them from emotionally engaging with spiritual communities. Men may find pathways to spirituality through service or leadership, aligning their religious actions with societal expectations of masculine duty.
In Buddhism, for example, the focus on discipline and community can inspire men to pursue spiritual growth through meditation and ethical living, often framed within a traditional view of male resilience and duty. Nevertheless, this approach can hinder emotional connectedness within community practices that women often navigate more fluidly.
Final Analysis: In societies that value religious freedom or those that enforce a state religion, gender hierarchy often leads to men being perceived as being more spiritual than women.
The discourse surrounding gender and religious engagement is multifaceted, influenced by sociocultural, historical, and personal factors. It is evident that while women tend to exhibit higher levels of religious engagement compared to men, their motivations often stem from a complex interplay of seeking community, safety, and emotional expression within various faith traditions. At the same time, societal constructs can impose limitations on women’s spiritual agency and reinforce traditional power dynamics within religious structures across cultures and religions.
Moreover, the reality that women may mask their true beliefs to conform to communal expectations underscores the need to critically evaluate the authenticity of religious engagement across genders. Conversely, men’s religious engagement, while rooted in leadership and community sacrifice, may reflect deeper social expectations that discourage vulnerability and communal participation. As society continues to evolve, the dynamics of religious engagement among genders may also change, reflecting broader shifts in cultural and spiritual identity. This nuanced understanding highlights the diverse expressions of spirituality within major world religions, encouraging a richer dialogue about faith, gender, and societal roles.
LDS Church leaders have taught on many occasions that a woman should obey her husband. Some examples from the 1800s include that of Orson Pratt who wrote in 1852 that a woman should not marry a man unless she “had fully resolved herself to submit herself wholly to his counsel, and let him govern as the head”. Additionally, apostles Heber C. Kimball and George A. Smith both taught in the temple in the 1840s that a wife must be “in subjection” to her husband. Young also taught in the temple that Adam only received the tokens of the priesthood after learning to not listen to his wife, and that women won’t get back to God unless they follow a man back. Because these teachings on women were given by top leaders in temple they became unquestioned parts of LDS culture.
Other examples of teachings on LDS women in marriages include church president Harold B. Lee’s 1972 article “Maintain Your Place as a Woman” which stated, “the wife is to obey the law of her husband” (with the caveat “only as he obeys the laws of God”). In contrast, Spencer W. Kimball said that a man “presides” rather than “rules”. Early prophet Brigham Young stated of his wives, “The influence of my women over me is no more than the buzzing of a fly’s wing in winter.” He also stated, “A woman is the dirtiest creature, dirtier than a man”, and “Men are honest, but if a woman won’t lie, she is a miracle.” Excerpt from: Mormonism and women
“A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner. But women will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety.” 1 Timothy 2:11-15
“And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.” Genesis 2:18
elroypoet.blog 