My Fair Lady

There once was a lady so fine,
Whose perspective on life was divine.
She listened with care,
And showed empathy fair,
For she was an influencer online.

The Tale of the Rose-colored Lenses

In a vibrant village called Perspectives, every resident received a unique pair of glasses at birth. These glasses came in an array of colors—some sparkling blue, others warm amber, and quite a few in shades of green, red, and purple. The villagers cherished their glasses, for they believed they offered a special glimpse into the world, making daily life full of wonder and meaning.

However, as the villagers began to mature, a strange phenomenon would unfold. Despite living in the same village, they found it increasingly difficult to agree on anything. When a grand feast was celebrated, some villagers marveled at the blossoms that adorned the tables, captivated by the beauty seen through their amber glasses. Meanwhile, others in blue-colored lenses gazed in awe at the glistening silverware, oblivious to the flowers’ charm. Arguments ensued, with each villager insisting that their view was the only correct one.

One day, a wise lady who wore rose-colored lenses decided to host a gathering at the village square to address the growing discord. She believed the villagers could benefit from a deeper understanding of one another. She invited everyone to bring their favorite views, and promised a grand unveiling of the truth behind their individual perspectives.

On the day of the gathering, the villagers arrived with their glasses on, proudly displaying their colors. The hostess welcomed them and encouraged everyone to share their unique perspectives on the world around them. As the villagers spoke, they described the beauty seen through their colored lenses—each story adding richness to the shared experience. However, their voices often clashed, creating disagreements.

Then, the hostess presented her idea. “Why not swap our glasses for just a moment?” she suggested. Hesitant at first, the villagers eventually agreed, curious about how others perceived their beloved village.

As they swapped glasses, laughter and gasps filled the air. The villagers experienced the vibrant beauty of the flowers through the blue lenses, the gleam of the silverware through the amber, and the world became a kaleidoscope of color and emotions. They began to see how each perspective added to the complexity of their village and how together, they painted a far richer picture than any single viewpoint could provide.

When the villagers returned their glasses to each other, they found themselves transformed. They no longer felt isolated within their separate hues; rather, they understood that each color was valuable and necessary for a complete view of their cherished land.

From that day on, the villagers of Perspectives became known for their open hearts and listening ears. They learned to appreciate the beauty in each other’s experiences, fostering a community where dialogue flourished and conflicts waned. No longer bound by the limitations of their individual lenses, they grew together in understanding and friendship, creating a tapestry of unity woven from many vibrant threads.

And thus, the tale of Perspectives reminds us that while our individual lenses may differ, unity can be found in empathy, and the true beauty of our shared existence comes alive when we embrace and understand each other’s views.

Edited By: ElRoyPoet, 2025

Don’t put people in boxes

The Nature of Intermittence and Communication in Everyday Life

Our everyday lives embody the concept of “intermittence,” where we encounter events at different times that may not always feel consistent or logical. This notion sheds light on why seemingly calm and rational individuals may also subscribe to conspiracy theories or supernatural beliefs. As human beings, we live in a world filled with diverse and often conflicting perspectives on reality. These perspectives rarely align to create a uniform viewpoint, making communication and understanding between individuals a complex endeavor.

When examining the notion of perspective, it helps to understand how personal experiences shape our views. According to psychologist Carl Rogers, each person’s perspective is influenced by their background, experiences, and feelings, providing a unique “lens” through which they interpret the world (Rogers, 1961). This understanding is crucial because it illustrates why individuals may perceive the same event differently, leading to misunderstandings and conflict. For example, a study conducted by McLeod (2018) highlights that differing backgrounds significantly impact how people interpret social situations and the actions of others, thereby affecting their responses.

As we navigate our lives, we often encounter people with beliefs that contradict our own. This can lead to disagreements, particularly in discussions about topics such as politics, religion, or morality. Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt emphasizes the importance of recognizing these different perspectives and cultivating empathy to bridge gaps in understanding (Haidt, 2012). He argues that when we take the time to understand where someone else is coming from, we reduce the likelihood of conflict and promote healthier communication.

However, the challenge remains: how can we communicate more effectively with peers despite our differing viewpoints? One key solution lies in practicing active listening. Active listening involves fully concentrating on what the other person is saying, rather than simply waiting for your turn to speak. This technique encourages individuals to empathize with others and understand their viewpoints more deeply (Brown, 2015). By implementing active listening strategies, individuals can create a space for open dialogue, reducing misunderstandings and fostering a more inclusive atmosphere.

Additionally, it is vital to approach conversations with an open mind, ready to consider alternative viewpoints. Acknowledging the possibility that your perspective might not always be the only one can significantly enrich discussions. This approach is supported by research from the University of California, Berkeley, which found that people who engage in open-minded discussions are more likely to reach mutual understanding and find common ground (Dixon et al., 2016).

In conclusion, the concept of intermittence highlights the complexity of human experiences and perspectives. While these differences can lead to misunderstandings and conflict, adopting strategies such as active listening and maintaining an open mind can significantly enhance communication. By creating an environment where diverse viewpoints are valued and understood, we can bridge gaps and promote more effective interactions with our peers. Embracing this mindset not only enriches our social experiences but also contributes to a more harmonious community where varying perspectives are celebrated rather than challenged.

References:

  1. Brown, B. (2015). Dare to Lead: Brave Work. Tough Conversations. Whole Hearts. Random House.
  2. Dixon, J., Walker, I., & Smith, J. (2016). Toward effective communication in the workplace: Lessons from open-mindedness research. University of California, Berkeley
  3. Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. Pantheon Books.
  4. McLeod, S. (2018). Social Identity Theory. simplypsychology.org
  5. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.

Most people are DELUSIONAL: the psychosis of everyday life

Summary: Our everyday lives show the idea of “intermittence,” which means that we experience events at different times that don’t always last or make complete sense. This is why some people who seem calm and rational might also believe in conspiracy theories or the supernatural. Living involves seeing many different and sometimes conflicting views of reality. These different opinions rarely come together to form one clear “perspective.” Perspective is like a lens that helps us see the world; it helps us understand what is happening around us. Everyone has their own perspective based on their experiences, beliefs, and feelings, which makes life both interesting and challenging. These differences in viewpoints can lead to arguments between individuals. One person may be addressing one aspect of a situation while another is focused on pursuing a different outcome, with each influenced by their respective backgrounds and desires.

“When you start understanding the science and psychology of hate, you begin to realize that there are numerous complex reasons for your hatred towards people. In an ideal world, we would love and respect everyone we interact with. Everyone will be compassionate, emphatic, generous, considerate and kind. We will accept each other’s views no matter how opposing they may be to ours and would learn from different perspectives. But reality is far from ideal. And this is perhaps why we often get upset, angry and annoyed with others.” Excerpt from 5 Reasons Why You Hate People According To Psychology

“People don’t (stop hating) because a veil lifts and they are suddenly able to see hate for what it is…They leave because it makes sense for them, because the value hate once gave them has diminished or evaporated…The reality is, people rarely change their personality or ideals during adulthood, and if they do, it needs to be something they do on their own, for themselves…I realized much too late that (hate) is a huge waste of life.” By: Corinna Olsen

“In every encounter, we either give life or we drain it; there is no neutral exchange.” By: Brennan Manning

“I plead with you to control your tempers, to put a smile upon your faces, which will erase anger; speak out with words of love and peace, appreciation, and respect. If you will do this, your lives will be without regret. Your marriages and family relationships will be preserved. You will be much happier. You will do greater good. You will feel a sense of peace that will be wonderful.” By: Gordon B. Hinckley

“Woke and cancel culture are both signs of a judgmental culture, not a mentally mature one. A world where you cannot even speak to another person without worrying about what they are going to think of you, has not advanced much from the days when the white people used to own slaves. Let me tell you this, if you are kind, if you are compassionate, if you hold no discrimination towards people whatsoever, then you have no reason to worry about whether you are woke enough.” By: Abhijit Naskar

Cancel Culture Definition: A way of behaving in society or a group, especially on social media, in which it is common to completely reject and stop supporting someone because they have said or done something that offends you. Cancel culture has its place—it helps to call out and remove toxic people from mainstream culture.

Let’s call cancel culture what it really is: our way of exerting some control over a world that is increasingly becoming more dangerous and less tolerant.

In cancel culture, we appoint ourselves the arbiters of truth or right and wrong, as well as the judge and jury, because, thanks to social media, we get to dole out punishment.

The main argument against cancel culture is that it doesn’t give people who have wronged society the opportunity to apologize and learn from their mistakes. There is zero tolerance for bullying, bigotry, and racism.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.